Phrymaceae and Fabaceae

Erythranthe guttata vs Trifolium aureum

These two are not on this page because a keyword tool suggested them. They are here because our own identification model genuinely mistook one for the other, on real photographs, 3 times. We publish the rate, and then we tell you what actually separates them.

Confused 3x by our model Method published

Side by sidefigs. a and b

Erythranthe guttata, photographed by Arvel Hernandez
fig. a Arvel Hernandez, CC BY 4.0

Erythranthe guttata

seep monkeyflower
Trifolium aureum, photographed by Mark Apgar
fig. b Mark Apgar, CC BY 4.0

Trifolium aureum

large hop clover

How often our model gets it wrong measured, not estimated

When the plant was The model said How often
Trifolium aureum Erythranthe guttata 3 of 20 (15%)

Measured on 38,299 openly licensed, research-grade photographs. Full method and dataset.

What actually separates themon the record

Family Phrymaceae versus Fabaceae. Different families, which is a real separation.
Genus Erythranthe versus Trifolium.
Flowering Peaks in May versus July. If the plant is in flower, timing helps. (n = 5,376 and 1,272.)

What we do not have yet: the diagnostic morphological character that a botanist would key on, from a source we can cite. We are not going to invent one. Until we have it, this page tells you the two are genuinely confusable, how often, and what the taxonomy and the flowering data do and do not settle.

Both recordsfull pages