Pterophylla racemosa(L.f.) Pillon & H.C.Hopkins

kāmahi

WFO wfo-1000028636 Accepted WFO 2026-06 7 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–g

Pterophylla racemosa, photographed by Kelvin Perrie
fig. a Kelvin Perrie, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-05-01 / obs. 192765780

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Confused withby our own model

These are not lookalikes we guessed at. Each one is a species our identification model genuinely mistook for this plant, and how many times. The error rate is published.

Flowering n = 643 observations

Flowering observations of Pterophylla racemosa by month
MonthObservations
Jan73
Feb2
Mar2
Apr2
May2
Jun4
Jul1
Aug3
Sep6
Oct32
Nov273
Dec243

Peak flowering in Nov, from 643 community-annotated observations worldwide. This is a global aggregate, not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres, and citizen-science records cluster near cities, at weekends, and in spring. Where a species has fewer than 30 annotated records we do not draw this chart at all.

Also published as 4 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Leiospermum racemosum (L.f.) D.Don
  • Weinmannia racemosa L.f.
  • Weinmannia speciosa Banks & Sol. ex A.Cunn.
  • Windmannia racemosa (L.f.) Kuntze

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice, no toxicity claim and no native range, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.