Rudbeckia amplexicaulisVahl

clasping coneflower

WFO wfo-0000072191 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h

Rudbeckia amplexicaulis, photographed by saltyhiker
fig. a saltyhiker, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-05-14 / obs. 197772471

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Confused withby our own model

These are not lookalikes we guessed at. Each one is a species our identification model genuinely mistook for this plant, and how many times. The error rate is published.

Flowering n = 1,439 observations

Flowering observations of Rudbeckia amplexicaulis by month
MonthObservations
Jan6
Feb6
Mar114
Apr463
May562
Jun194
Jul53
Aug13
Sep11
Oct5
Nov3
Dec9

Peak flowering in May, from 1,439 community-annotated observations worldwide. This is a global aggregate, not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres, and citizen-science records cluster near cities, at weekends, and in spring. Where a species has fewer than 30 annotated records we do not draw this chart at all.

Also published as 4 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Dracopis amplexicaulis (Vahl) Cass.
  • Dracopis amplexicaulis (Vahl) Less.
  • Rudbeckia perfoliata Cav.
  • Rudbeckia spathulata Nutt.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice, no toxicity claim and no native range, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.